Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention (QIPP)
The Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) collection is intended to be a resource for everyone in the NHS, public health and social care for making decisions about patient care or the use of resources. The collection comprises:
- QIPP case studies are examples of how health and social care staff are improving quality and productivity across the NHS and social care. Case studies are evaluated based on quality improvements, savings, evidence and implementation and are peer reviewed.
- Cochrane quality and productivity topics which are drawn from systematic reviews by the Cochrane Collaboration that may help inform local initiatives address the quality and productivity challenge
- Links to other tools and resources that support the quality and productivity challenge.
Click here to view the Process Manual which describes the processes for the quality assurance of QIPP case studies and Cochrane quality and productivity topics.
Click here for a full list of all published QIPP case studies including a tool that allows potential savings to be calculated and sorted based on quality gains.
To receive a monthly alert detailing new QIPP case studies published to the collection, please email your contact details to: firstname.lastname@example.org.
If you have a good initiative that you are currently implementing or have implemented already, we want to hear from you. Our analysts will be happy to talk to you and provide advice on the suitability of your initiative for the collection and the type/level of information required. Go to "Help us to build the QIPP collection" to find out more about completing a submission.
Recommended QIPP case studies
To reduce harm during the perioperative period by encouraging theatre teams to consistently apply evidence-based practices and safety checks to all patients, and by improving teamwork and communication by following the Five Steps to Safer Surgery
To assist the primary care organisations still to implement Serum Natriuretic Peptide (Serum NP: either BNP or NTproBNP) testing as part of the primary care diagnostic pathway for heart failure, through the spread of evidence, good practice and
Oesophageal Doppler-guided fluid management during major surgery: reducing postoperative complications and bed days
This initiative from the NHS Technology Adoption Centre (NTAC) examined the effects of introducing oesophageal Doppler monitoring (ODM) for fluid administration during major or high risk surgery on length of stay. Barriers to procurement and
To reduce the number of unnecessary suspect glaucoma referrals to the hospital eye service in Bexley Care Trust, thereby improving quality of referral, generating savings and releasing capacity. A glaucoma repeat measurement scheme, in which the
This case study describes how a Trust is aiming to prevent inpatient falls by developing a stepwise approach underpinned by information from national sources. It is calculated that in an average 800-bed acute hospital trust, there will be about 24
Help us to build the QIPP Collection
Submit Your Ideas
We wants to hear from you if you have an example you think should be part of the QIPP collection.
The QIPP User Guide outlines the level of supporting information you need to provide in your submission. Then use the QIPP Submission Template to submit your example.
- QIPP Submission User Guide.
- QIPP Submission Template.
- SDU Carbon Impact Assessment Template (Optional - see User Guide)
Please email your completed submission form or any questions you may have to email@example.com
We would like to hear from health and social care professionals who are interested in becoming external advisers for the QIPP collection. External advisers support our quality assurance process by helping to assess new examples which have been submitted to us. More information is available on the external adviser role description .
and submit these to firstname.lastname@example.org
Cochrane quality and productivity topics
The Cochrane topics in the NICE QIPP collection come from the ‘implications for practice’ section in systematic reviews written by health professionals working internationally and published by the Cochrane Collaboration. They are presented here with relevant background information, including costing analysis. The Cochrane topics may help to inform local initiatives to address the quality and productivity challenge.
Links to other tools and resources
NICE has a range of products and services including ‘do not do’ recommendations, 'referral advice' recommendations and the Shared Learning database to help reduce inneficiency and share learning in implementation.
The site was created by the DH policy team to find and bring together information about QIPP, its workstreams and regional commissioning plans.
Audit Commission resources include a briefing which looks at reducing spending on low clinical value treatments. Also, their health studies programme aims to improve local public services through its independent authoritative analysis of national evidence and local practice.
This key resource aims to reduce unwarranted variation in healthcare to increase value and improve quality (prepared by Muir Gray and Phil daSilva).
Health Foundation review of the evidence of whether improving quality can also save money for health service providers.
Seven medical specialties address how they can help tackle the NHS financial challenge.